shrine to sea

Newly revealed plans show Council and State govt blocked a beautiful boulevard on Kerferd Rd with safe green transport links

Bike Melbourne and the Port Phillip Bicycle Users Group have received plans for the Shrine to Sea proposal, under an FOI application.

Aerial photo of a boulevard with wide grassy median, with city skyline in background

Kerferd Rd is one of the City of Port Phillip’s planned network of safe cycle routes.   It links Anzac Station, and the protected bike lanes on St Kilda Rd, with the beach and the Bay Trail.  It runs past several schools, the Moray St bike lanes, MSAC and Albert Park.   Kerferd Rd has one of the highest crash rates for Council-controlled roads. 

The documents show that the planned protected bike lane delivered the on the priorities set by the community. Councillors scuttled the state government funded project in 2023 without substantive justification. The community has missed out on the investment, the improved landscaping, and the safety benefits to all users.

An infographic showing number and location of crashes on Kerferd Rd

Shrine to Sea history

The original Shrine to Sea plan was to improve the boulevard that runs from the Shrine of Remembrance, along Albert Rd past Albert Park, and then down Kerferd Rd to the beach.   

A diverse community panel met extensively online during the pandemic to discuss the priorities for the community, the opportunities and constraints. The community panel’s recommendations are here.   Among the recommendations:  Bike lanes to be interconnected for the entire length of the boulevard (LC01) and Use landscaping to define a separate bike pathway on Kerferd Road to isolate bikes from cars (LC08).    In Nov 2021, DELWP mostly supported these recommendations, though they noted that in places shared paths would be used instead of dedicated on-road lanes.   

A streetscape, showing a grassy median with trees, traffic lane, parking lane with silver car, planting with flowers, bike lane crossed by a pedestrian crossing, nature strip, footpath.  There is a person crossing with a pram.

The protected bike lane would also improve connections to the car parking, and include extra planting.

Despite this initial positive assessment, pressure by councillors led to the State government dropping the protected bike lane aspect of the project. In 2023 the State Government “decided that further targeted engagement is required for a safer active transport solution along Kerferd Road. For this reason, the protected bike lane is being separated from the Shrine to Sea masterplan to be considered at a future time”.  

Decision making 

There were community campaigns both for and against the separated bike lane.   Opponents of the separated bike lane shared a lot of misinformation, including about bin collection, parking capacity, and safety that could have been easily resolved.  It’s disappointing that those with access to the full reports did not use this information to inform the community.    We are sharing the results of the FOI to partially remedy this.

The decision to shelve the bike lanes (or “separate them from the project”) was made by State Government in May 2023 behind closed doors, under pressure from Port Phillip councillors. Port Phillip council is responsible for Kerferd Rd, and may have spooked their funding partner for any future improvements. 

At a meeting in August 2023, Council failed to support the protected bike lane aspects of the plan, and instead asked the Victorian government for support for generally ineffective measures to address crashes such as “white line-marking, green treatments at conflict points and additional regulatory signage”.  

What the documents show

There was extensive investigation of 5 design scenarios:  the current situation; a buffered bike lane; a bike lane on the median;  the protected bike lane; and a service-road bike lane (north section only). 

Each design was assessed using the Healthy Streets Design Check Tool for Australia; and through the Shrine to Sea Metric Criteria assessment which was developed in response to local resident and community feedback, policy alignment and operational needs of DEECA and CoPP.  

Under the Healthy Streets assessment tool, the protected bike lane scored highest (or equal highest between Richardson and Danks St).   The protected bike lane also scored highest under the Shrine to Sea metric criteria. 

Table showing how the different scenarios rated on the healthy streets and S2S metrics.  The protected bike lane ranks first.
Table showing how the different scenarios rate under healthy streets and S2S metrics.  Protected bike lane ranks first.

The protected bike lane scenario:

  • would preserve access to properties for people using cars, keep almost all car parks and improve access to car parks by extra crossings of the wide drain

  • be suitable for use by all micromobility modes, including scooters, trikes; and all users including kids and the elderly

  • leave sufficient capacity for vehicle traffic, with intersection modelling assessment showing that the proposed cycle infrastructure can be accommodated within the existing network without any major deterioration in intersection performance at two of the three sites evaluated. At the Ferrars/Canterbury intersection, there would be an average extra delay of 28 seconds for vehicles during the AM peak. 

  • Allow construction of safe pedestrian access to the central median

  • Include new plantings curbside

Rendering of the protected bike lane plan, showing extensive planting

Projected benefits of the protected bike lane include:

  • Increased ability of kids to ride to school, sport and around their community

  • Better cycle access to destinations like MSAC, the South Melbourne Market, Anzac Station, and the beach, leaving more car parking available for those who drive

  • Discourage hooning on Kerferd Rd through road redesign for slower speeds


Specific concerns addressed


These are concerns that were raised at the August 2023 council meeting. 

“The bike path surface will be sloped which will make it dangerous for people on trikes.”   Concept plans show a standard, flat bike lane surface, of similar width and cross-section to lanes on St Kilda Rd. This would be useable by people on bikes, scooters, mobility scooters, and trikes.

“There was no co-design process.”  The community panel went through a process informed by subject matter experts on design principles, landscaping, and accessibility.    

“This will displace vehicle traffic on to neighbourhood streets”.  This wasn’t modelled specifically (at least in the documents that were released) but there is no evidence for this available.

“One lane is not sufficient for an arterial road.” Kerferd Rd is not an arterial road.   Capacity is generally limited by intersection capacity rather than number of lanes, and modelling of intersection effects showed minimal impacts at 2 of the 3 intersections studied, and a 28 second delay during morning peak at the Ferrars/Canterbury intersection. 

“This will make it hard to access car parking”.   This was specifically studied.    In the current set-up, “pedestrians must traverse a turf nature strip, non-mountable concrete kerb and bluestone spoon drain, which in some locations is very steep and deep”.   With the  protected bike lane,   “access to the parking spaces will be enhanced by new raised crossing points that remove the existing difficulties that people with mobility issues face today due to the lack of connections to footpaths, navigating high kerbs, and having to cross steep sections of uneven bluestone paving”, a clear improvement on current conditions.

Regarding overall number of parking places:   the protected bike lane has a reduction in parking places of 14%.   According to the released documents, “The design retains sufficient car parking to cater for the demand of users based on occupancy surveys completed in Nov/Dec 2022”.  The average occupancy rate of car parks along Kerferd Rd was 59%, and it is demonstrated that “that in most sections along Kerferd Road, even when occupancy is at its highest, there is a surplus of available car bays”.

Documents referenced:

Plans received from the  FOI, including:

  Concept plans for the protected bike lane

Detailed comparison of five different scenarios

Recommendations of the community panel

City of Port Phillip Integrated Transport Strategy.


Images in this post come from Design Scenarios and Assessment for Shrine to Sea cycling corridor— Kerferd Rd.

Update: Kerferd Rd bike lane August 2023

The Shrine to Sea project is starting consultation on their (much downgraded) masterplan, with the bike lane removed.  

Also, this Wednesday, the Port Phillip Council is deciding on what their position will be.   They have identified 3 options:  1. advocating for no bike lane, 2. advocating for the protected bike lane, or 3. advocating for a bike path in the median strip.  The report before council  clearly lays out that Option 1 does not address the significant safety issues already existing on the corridor, and Option 3 will lead to more substantial traffic disruptions.    On the other hand, Option 2 is consistent with achieving a more sustainable city, with liveable streets for everyone to enjoy. 

Despite the clear path forward here, I expect some Councillors to continue to amplify the scare campaign run by a small number of residents.   

Please come to Council this Wednesday 16th August (either in person or online) to make a short statement about how the bike lane would be good for you.   To do this, fill in the Request to Speak form by 4pm Wednesday, for agenda item 10.1.  If you don't feel comfortable speaking, your presence in support would be wonderful.   The meeting is at St Kilda Town Hall, 6.30pm.  Public comment is at the beginning, so you should be finished by 7.30pm.    

And if not, you can write to your local councillors--- email addresses are here. 

Separate to Council, the Vic Government is consulting on their draft masterplan (the one that had the bike lanes removed). To ask for their reinstatement— please fill in the survey at https://engage.vic.gov.au/shrinetosea.

Update: the outcome of the August council meeting was that the Council decided not to support the protected bike lane on Kerferd Rd. Voting for this were Cunsolo, Clarke, Sirakoff, Bond, Pearl. Supporting the protected bike lane were Baxter, Nyaguy, Martin, Crawford.

Update on Shrine to Sea project, July 2023

In May, the Shrine to Sea project announced that they were separating the protected bike lane from the project:

In reviewing the draft masterplan, the Victorian Government considered a number of issues, including the Department of Transport and Planning’s decision to remove temporary Pop-Up Bike Lanes from the City of Port Phillip, and decided that further targeted engagement is required for a safer active transport solution along Kerferd Road. For this reason, the protected bike lane is being separated from the Shrine to Sea masterplan to be considered at a future time.

Recall that the community consultation panel recommended the separated bike lane, and the objectives of this project were to:

  • Enhance the green boulevard

  • Create safer and clearer links and connections for walking and cycling

  • Celebrate local stories

  • Improve usable open space

In June, the Port Phillip Bicycle Users Group met with the project team to find out more about this decision and the way forward.    These are our questions and the answers.

What happens next?

The draft plan will be released for public comment as soon as possible.  It will not include the separated bike lane. 

How can the separated bike path be built?

There will be a targeted "robust engagement process" around the bike lane at a future time and the State government is currently discussing the pathway forward.  The design proposals included in the draft plan have been carefully considered to make sure they don’t restrict future options that could be included in the engagement process. The $13M budget was never intended to cover all the masterplan costs.  It will help deliver many elements in the plan but there will be a need for additional funds.  This is also partly due to the increase in costs since the start of the project.   

Usability of footpaths and use of the footpaths by scooters/bikes are key concerns of pedestrians, particularly disabled users (per Vision Australia) and older people (per Victoria Walks).  Pedestrians currently have difficulty crossing Kerferd Rd.  How are these concerns being addressed under the revised plans?

The masterplan can’t address use of existing street footpaths as these are matters for the Council or relevant land managers. Nonetheless accessibility and safety principles are key to the designs in the draft. The proposed protected bike lane design did include improved accessibility solutions and safer crossings on Kerferd Road, and this will now be dealt with in the future engagement process.  

Kerferd Rd, looking towards the sea

What happens to the design work undertaken on the 5 options for the bike lane that S2S has done, including the Healthy Streets assessment, the Shrine to Sea metric criteria assessment,  community feedback, and traffic modelling--- will this be released?

Reports and assessments completed for the 5 options, including all the renders, plans etc will be passed on to the next state government project team that gets the responsibility for progressing this. DEECA had intended to release the reports with the draft masterplan when it included the protected bike lane, but these will now form part of the next engagement process.  The state government wants to make sure there is an engagement process in place for this as some of this material is technical and requires support in explaining or interpreting the information.

Current plans are to re-open the Herbert St crossover when the S2S plan is complete.   This is one of the identified high crash locations.   Will this stay closed or re-open?   

The proposed design solution for the Herbert Road crossover will be in the draft plan so everyone will be able to provide feedback at that time. DEECA has worked with Council closely on the design proposal.

What will the "robust engagement" process be?  

There will be a targeted engagement process, with opportunity for some mythbusting and shared information.  More info about car parking, bins, traffic flows. The precise nature of the engagement is not yet known.